Skip to main content

The Disturbing History of Lobotomies

by Gerselle Koh

In the TV series Ratched, Dr Hanover performed a lobotomy in an open theatre, with the presence of both the press and the governor. Originally, he attempted the procedure with a drill, but after receiving strong reactions to the copious amounts of blood, he opted for the more 'sophisticated' technique of inserting an ice pick into the top of an eye socket. If you thought that scene in Ratched where Hanover gave a lobotomy with an ice pick was an artistic exaggeration - it wasn't. That's how Walter Freeman, a populariser of lobotomies in the 1940s, performed thousands of operations.

Neurologists António Egas Moniz and Walter Freeman are usually credited with inventing the lobotomy in the 1930s, though their work was largely based on Swiss psychiatrist Gottlieb Burckhardt, who performed some of the first psychosurgeries on patients' frontal lobes and other parts of their brains in the 1880s. While Burckhardt intended for the utility of the surgery to be ‘at most palliative,’ his research was harshly rejected by the medical community for being disturbing and ineffective. 

To further refine Burckhardt’s surgical technique, Moniz developed a more specific process called the leucotomy, which involved inserting a small surgical rod with a retractable wire loop into the brain. The procedure began to gain acceptance as a primary treatment for psychiatric diseases - even though Moniz kept poor records of patient follow-ups and even returned some patients to asylums postoperatively. 

The procedure was also introduced to neurologist Walter Freeman and neurosurgeon James Watts, who championed this migration, aiming to improve on the results of their international colleagues. They modified the procedure so that it required nothing more than a small 1 cm burr hole that could be drilled for the insertion of the leucotome. This undoubtedly made the procedure less invasive, but it still came with the postoperative risks of seizure disorders, infections, and even death.

One of the most notable lobotomy patients is Rosemary Kennedy, the sister of former US President John F. Kennedy. During her birth, a nurse held her inside the birth canal for two hours, which caused oxygen deprivation and resulted in a mental deficiency. She was described as irritable and rebellious, and her father sought the advice of none other than Freeman and Watts. Eventually, her father authorised her lobotomy, which not only failed to cure her intellectual disabilities, but also left Rosemary with permanent physical and mental disabilities, completely unable to live independently up to her death. 

Despite many failed procedures, they published articles about their work in prestigious scientific journals, reporting that patients who had been violent or suicidal, were calmed down immeasurably by the surgery. In a 1942 presentation at the New York Academy of Medicine, Freeman and Watts reported that after a lobotomy, patients did sometimes become ‘indolent’ or ‘outspoken.’ In truth, patients were often left incontinen and paralysed. Their first prefrontal lobotomy was on a woman named Alice Hood Hammatt who reported that she felt happy when she awoke from the procedure. But six days later, she reported experiencing language difficulties, disorientation, and agitation. 

Their work had simplified the lobotomy so much that Freeman began performing the procedure without the help of his colleague and without the sterile field that was often required in the operating room. This distanced Watts from the research, as he was disturbed by the crude nature of the transorbital approach. In time, the two severed their ties, but Freeman continued with his passionate crusade to popularise the transorbital lobotomy throughout North America. 

However, Freeman held peculiar beliefs about the psychological makeup and social influences of people of color, and these affected his treatment of patients. He believed that African American patients, especially women, were among the best candidates for lobotomy because of what he called “the greater family solidarity manifested by these people.” 

At the same time, women disproportionately became targets for lobotomisation. Out of Freeman’s first twenty psychosurgery patients, seventeen of them were women. From the 1940s through the mid-1950s, men slightly outnumbered women as patients in state hospitals, yet female patients made up 60 percent of those who underwent lobotomies. 

The belief that a woman’s natural state was to be an obedient wife and devoted mother, and that any deviation from this was an effect of a disordered mind, has been repeated depressingly throughout the history of androcentric western medicine. In the book Unwell Women: Misdiagnosis and Myth in a Man-Made World written by Elinor Cleghorn, she writes, “In an era when a mentally healthy woman was a serene wife and mother, almost any behaviour or emotion that disrupted domestic harmony could be interpreted as justification for a lobotomy.”

Lobotomies were also used on a large proportion of women diagnosed women with ‘hysteria’, an alleged mental health condition that explained any behaviours that made men… uncomfortable. A fondness for writing and even infertility could fall easily under the umbrella of ‘female hysteria’.

While the rise of the lobotomy was slow and sequential, its demise seems to have happened rapidly. Named the most brutal, barbaric and infamous medical precedure of all time, several countries banned the procedure altogether in the 1970s. 

Most Popular

Fashion For a Cause: Brands That Stand with Palestine and the history of fashion as a form of Activism

by Oana-Maria Moldovan For over two months, there has been an ongoing genocide war in Gaza. To simplify a long and horrific issue, the situation that started, on a larger scale, around one hundred years ago, and has only become amplified since October 7th 2023. Taking place around the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and Israel–Lebanon border, the armed conflict is between Israel and Hamas-led Palestinian militant groups.  The problem is about “stolen” land. Said land is seen as an important holy part of both religions involved. But really, how holy can we consider a land to be, if people kill other people for it? It’s important to remember that this genocide is about three things: forced occupation, zionism, and religion. It’s also important to remember what ethnic erasure is. This terrible expresion, also known as cultural or ethnic assimilation, refers to the process by which the distinct cultural or ethnic identity of a particular group is gradually diminished or erased, often due to ext

‘Make Tattooing Safe Again’: Sheffield Based Tattoo Artist Exposed for Indecent Behaviour

 by Emily Fletcher TW: SA, Animal Abuse, Transphobia Photo Credit: @ meiko_akiz uki Recently, an  Instagram account  has been created to provide a  ‘space to safely give a voice to those who want to speak out about the behaviour of one, Sheffield based tattoo artist’. A  total of 40+ posts have been made by the above social media account regarding  one of Sheffield's most popular tattoo artists .  Thankfully, all posts are prefaced with a Content Warning prior to sharing screenshots of the messages that have been sent anonymously to the page. The majority of Content Warnings refer to sexual behaviour, abuse, and sexual assault. It is clear that there is a reoccurring theme within each submission, as many clients appear to have had the same experiences with the tattoo artist. Women, mostly, are being made to feel uncomfortable while being tattooed. One of the most vulnerable positions anyone can be in, tattoo artists should make their clients feel comfortable and safe during the pro

Now What? The Aftermath of the 'Manic Pixie Dream Girl'

by Susan Moore Here is a bit about me: I am an open, excitable, creative AFAB who is also moderately attractive. I have a unique sense of personal style and a personality that on the surface can only be described as “bubbly” and “quirky”. For this reason, dating is a nightmare. To be sure, I do not have a hard time finding dates or potential suitors. The problems arise when said dates spend some time with me and decide that I am a rare specimen, and the connection they feel with me is “unlike anything they have felt before”. Then, things go one of two ways.  Either a) they decide I am too high maintenance and no longer palatable, or  b) they choose to never look further than the surface and are content to date the idea of me rather than the real me. There is something rather interesting, perhaps funny, about my situation. It is in no way unique. I have met so many people who constantly dealt with the same problem. Even funnier still, is the fact that there is a trope that simultaneousl